Parano1d Lab · Technical research

Research for proof-native systems

Cryptographic protocols, verifiable-state architectures and research results produced during the development of Parano1d.

01 · Latest

Latest research

All research

Parano1d v2. From live value to live rights.

How Parano1d v2 extends live value to programmable rights: signatureless authorization, post-quantum security under the published v2 assumptions, committed programs and counters, shared recursive execution, six application templates, portable receipts and recovery after offline pruning.

Read the researchContract core and ABI 3
Protocol practice

ONETHICS ①

Verify the present. Know your rights. Keep your proofs. Build for those who come after us.

7 min readRead
Application research

Live Agents. Autonomy without trusted APIs.

Each participant checks funding and authority through its own Agent Core and exchanges verifiable receipts with other agents. No explorer or hosted API decides what is valid. Parano1d makes this practical without downloading and replaying the network's full transaction history.

12 min readRead
Security research

September Security Report

New papers on Poseidon2b, matrix backdoors, recursive Fiat-Shamir and soundness bounds, checked against Parano1d's production parameters.

4 min readRead
Security analysis

Poseidon2b Is Secure!

Security belongs to an exact instance. Fix GF(2^128), width four, the matrices, 8+58 rounds and feed-forward mode, then apply the published attacks.

11 min readRead
Security analysis

Parano1d meets NIST PQC Category 1

An executable end-to-end theorem accounts for the complete recursive State proof, parallel quantum-oracle access, coherent Poseidon2b response cost and every NIST MAXDEPTH point.

19 min readRead
Security analysis

FS-FRI security in Parano1d: a Block–Tiwari analysis

An exact Block–Tiwari analysis of Parano1d's production recursive State proof gives 127 provable and 127 conjectured bits against a 128-bit target.

14 min readRead
Protocol study

Why a block is accepted only with its recursive proof

An early design accepted a block first and produced its recursive proof later in the background. The canonical chain could therefore move ahead of the HistoryStep-proven tip, forcing nodes to persist and recover a second queue. The production design accepts the block and its matching HistoryStep together: one atomic object, one canonical height and no deferred proof backlog.

3 min readRead
Protocol study

Prove the block once, then search the nonce

HistoryStep binds every semantic header field under a nonce-free domain. PoW can vary the nonce without rebuilding the transition proof.

2 min readRead
Systems research

Bootstrapping from proof-carrying State

A joining node validates headers, verifies one recursive transition proof at a finalized boundary, installs exact live State and applies no more than eighteen recent blocks.

4 min readRead
Protocol study

Replacing a consensus quarantine with UTXO incarnations

A monotone creation identifier inside the existing value lane invalidates stale slot openings without a second consensus root or reuse quarantine.

3 min readRead
Engineering study

AuthStream: bounding a block-wide authorization workload

In an earlier 255-authorization layout, streaming compilation bounded 14–16 MiB of private input with 4.7% overhead. Its terminal proof missed the production latency budget.

3 min readRead
Protocol design

One owner, one authorization proof

One owner produces one witness-hiding authorization capsule for a complete logical spend, while HistoryStep proves its transparent State transition.

3 min readRead
Comparative study

Three polynomial-commitment experiments and the bottlenecks they exposed

Ladder FRI exposed proof-byte cost, FRI-Binius exposed source binding, and BaseFold exposed the cost of putting a verifier inside its successor.

4 min readRead

02 · Selected work

Current research record